Word Clouds for BSides SF and the RSA Conference

in

Word clouds are a great way to visualize text, especially on platforms like Twitter where a great amount of people can be talking about one subject. I recently spent the last 6 days at two San Francisco information security conferences: BSides San Francisco and RSA.

BSides this year was February 28–29 and RSA was February 29-March 4. There’s some overlap in attendees, but the talks and the feeling you get from being at the cons couldn’t be more different. BSides is community driven and the talks are mostly by security practitioners; RSA has a trade-show feel and most talks are conducted by people that work for security vendors.

I was curious about what words showed up most in tweets with the hashtags #BSidesSF and #RSAC and see how different or alike they were. I used the twitteR and wordcloud packages in R to generate these images.

Here’s #BsidesSF:

af40a-17omfqpbi2uetzpro_s10za.png

and here’s #RSAC:

27aab-1k1wzxr4mnj2nbr-xijlvug.png

People were definitely tweeting about different things; BSides attendees generally had more positive language and tweeted about presenters. RSA attendees tweeted about keynote speakers (like Sean Penn) and contained a lot of retweets mentions. I am also not surprised the word “booth” was a top keyword in #RSAC, from vendors tweeting out “Come to our booth and get a free pen!”

It was interesting to see the similarities and differences. Let me know what you think.

What combination locks teach us about encryption weakness

in

Last week, an interesting story made the rounds on social media about a researcher named Samy Kamkar who discovered a flaw in Master-brand combination locks and was able to open the lock in eight tries or less. It’s a great discovery and is of particular interest to security professionals because it teaches us about encryption, the concept of brute-force attacks and weaknesses in implementation.

Read More

What’s the difference between a vulnerability scan, penetration test and a risk analysis?

in

An often overlooked, but very important process in the development of any Internet-facing service is testing it for vulnerabilities, knowing if those vulnerabilities are actually exploitable in your particular environment and, lastly, knowing what the risks of those vulnerabilities are to your firm or product launch. These three different processes are known as a vulnerability assessment, penetration test and a risk analysis. Knowing the difference is critical when hiring an outside firm to test the security of your infrastructure or a particular component of your network.

Read More