Skip to content

SIRAcon 2021 Talk | Baby Steps: Easing your company into a quantitative cyber risk program

August 3, 2021Risk Quantification9 min read


Title slide for the talk "Baby Steps: Easing your company into a quantitative cyber risk program," with a toy stormtrooper helping a smaller one learn to walk

I’m pleased to announce that my talk, “Baby Steps: Easing your company into a quantitative cyber risk program”, has been accepted to SIRAcon ‘21. SIRAcon is the annual conference for the Society of Information Risk Analysts (SIRA), a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing quantitative risk analysis. The talk is scheduled for Wednesday, August 4th, 2021 at 11:15 am Eastern US time.

In the talk, I’ll be sharing tips, techniques, successes, failures, and war stories from my career in designing, implementing, and running quantitative risk programs.

Here’s the talk abstract:

Baby Steps: Easing your company into a quantitative cyber risk program

Risk managers tasked with integrating quantitative methods into their risk programs - or even those just curious about it - may be wondering, Where do I start? Where do I get the mountain of data I need? What if my key stakeholders want to see risk communicated in colors?

Attendees will learn about common myths and misconceptions, learn how to get a program started, and receive tips on integrating analysis rigor into risk culture. When it comes to quant risk, ripping the Band-Aid off is a recipe for failure. Focusing on small wins in the beginning, building support from within, and a positive bedside manner is the key to long-term success.

Update: here’s the link to the recording

Additional Resources from the Talk

It was a challenge to cram all the information I wanted to cover into 30 minutes. Sit me down with a few beers in a bar and I could talk about risk all night. This blog post is a companion piece to the talk, linking to the resources I covered and providing extra details. This post matches the flow of the talk so you can follow along.

The One Takeaway

Slide reading "The one takeaway from this talk: Just be better than you were yesterday."

The one takeaway from the talk is: Just be better than you were yesterday.

If you are considering or are in the process of implementing quantitative risk modeling into your risk program and you need to pause or stop for any reason, like lack of internal support, competing priorities, your executive sponsor leaves, that’s ok. There are no quant risk police to come yell at you for using a heat map.

We - the royal we - need to move off the risk matrix. The risk matrix has been studied extensively by those who study those sorts of things: data and decision scientists, engineers, statisticians, and many more. It’s not a credible and defensible decision-making tool. Having said that, the use of the risk matrix is an institutional problem. Fixing the deep issues of perverse incentives and “finger in the wind” methodologies canonized in the information security field doesn’t fall on your shoulders. Just do the best you can with what you have. Add rigor to your program where you can and never stop learning.

The Four Steps to a Quant Risk Program

Slide of four stages in order: pre-quant (a parody book cover, "What to Expect When You're Expecting a Quant Risk Program"), infancy (a baby in sunglasses on a pool float), adolescence (a Rage Against the Machine album cover) and grown-up (a "Like a Boss" mug), followed by a question mark

I have four general steps or phases to help build a quant risk program:

  1. Pre-quant: What to expect when you’re expecting a quant risk program - you are considering quantitative risk and this is how you prepare for it.
  2. Infancy: You’ve picked a model and methodology and you’re ready for your first few steps.
  3. Adolescence: You have several quantitative risk assessments done and you’re fully ready to rage against the qualitative machine. Not so fast – don’t forget to bring everyone along!
  4. Grown-up: Your program is mature and you’re making tweaks, making it better, and adding rigor.

(I’ve never made it past grown-up.)

You can follow these phases in your own program, of course modifying as you see fit until your program is all quant-based. Or, use as much of this or as little as you want, maturing your program as appropriate to your organization.

Step 1: What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Quant Risk Program

Step 1 slide with the parody cover "What to Expect When You're Expecting: A Quant Risk Program" and four tasks: training, add rigor to existing process, start collecting data sources and adopt a model

In this phase, you’re setting the foundational groundwork, going to training or self-study, and increasing the rigor of your existing qualitative program.

Training - Self-Study
Reading, of course, plenty of reading.

First, some books.

Even if you don’t plan on adopting Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR), I think it’s worth reading some of the documentation to help you get started. Many aspects of risk measurement covered in FAIR port well to any risk model you end up adopting. Check out the Open Group’s whitepapers on OpenFAIR, webinars, and blogs from the FAIR Institute and RiskLens.

Blogs are also a great way to stay up-to-date on risk topics, often directly from practitioners. Here are my favorites:

Webinars

Structured Training & Classes

Add rigor to the existing program
Risk scenario building is part of every formal risk management/risk assessment methodology. Some people skip this portion or do it informally in their qualitative risk programs. You can’t take this shortcut with qualitative risk; this is the first place the risk analyst scopes the assessment and starts to identify where and how to take risk measurements.

If not already, integrate a formal scenario-building process into your qualitative risk program. Document every step. This will make moving to quantitative risk much easier.

Some frameworks that have risk scoping components are:

Adopt a Model
What model are you going to use? Most people use FAIR, but there are others.

Collect Data Sources
Start collecting data sources in your qualitative program. If someone rates the likelihood and magnitude of a data breach as “high,” where could you go to get more information? Write these sources down, even if you’re not ready to start collecting data. Here are a few starting places:

  • Lists of internal data sources: Audits, previous assessments, incident logs and reports, vuln scans, BCP reports
  • External data: Your ISAC, VERIS / DBIR, Cyentia reports, SEC filings, news reports, fines & judgments from regulatory agencies
  • Subject matter experts: Experts in each area you have a risk scenario for; people that inform the frequency of events and the magnitude (often not the same)

Step 2: Infancy

Step 2 slide, infancy, with a baby in sunglasses on a pool float and two tasks: find a decision and do an assessment, and get stakeholders accustomed to numbers

You’ve picked a model and methodology and you’re ready for your first few steps.

Perform a risk analysis on a management decision
Find someone that has a burning question and perform a risk assessment, outside of your normal risk management process and outside the risk register. The goal is to help this individual make a decision. Some examples:

Examples of decisions a risk assessment can support: insurance analysis, such as gaps in cyber insurance coverage or whether to self-insure; adding or removing a control; project ROI; emerging risk analysis of oddball, exotic risks; and M&A activity

Get stakeholders accustomed to numbers

Step 3 – Adolescence

Step 3 slide, adolescence, with three tasks: more risk assessments, build a database of forecasts and watch your bedside manner

You have several quant risk assessments done and are fully ready to rage against the qualitative machine – but not so fast! Don’t forget to bring everyone along!

Perform more decision-based risk assessments
In this step, perform several more decision-based risk analyses. See the list in Step 2 for some ideas. At this point, you’ve probably realized that quantitative cyber risk analysis is not a sub-field of cybersecurity. It’s a sub-field of decision science.

Check out:

Build a Database of Forecasts

Record the frequency and magnitude forecasts for every single risk assessment you perform. You will find that over time, many assessments use the same data or, at least, can be used as a base rate. Building a library of forecasts will speed up assessments - the more you do, the faster they will be.

Some examples:

Slide titled "Track your forecasts: Frequency Tables" with example ranges, such as a reportable data breach between once every 10 and once every 15 years, laptop and mobile device theft between 10 and 40 times a year, and phishing clicks between 10 and 50 a month
Slide titled "Track your forecasts: Magnitude Tables" with example ranges, such as 80 to 200 hours of incident response for 500 to 1,500 records, customer worth of $1,000 to $1,500 a year, and $300,000 to $1 million for external forensics after a major security incident

Watch Your Bedside Manner
This is the easiest tip and one that so few people do. It’s an unfortunate fact: the risk matrix is the de facto language of cyber / technology risk. It’s in the CISSP and CRISC, it’s an acceptable methodology to pass organizational audits like SOX, SOC2, and FFIEC and it’s what’s taught in university curriculums. When moving both organizations and people over to quantitative models, be kind and remember that this a long game.

Do this:

  • Recognize the hard work people have put into existing qualitative risk programs
  • Focus on improving the rigor and fidelity of analysis
  • Talk about what I can do for you: help YOU make decisions

Don’t do this:

  • Disparage previous work & effort on qualitative programs.
  • Quote Tony Cox in the breakroom, even though he’s right. “[Risk matrices are] worse than useless.”
  • Force all people to consume data one way – your way

Step 4: Grown-up

Step 4 slide, grown-up, with a person holding a "Like a Boss" mug and three tasks: integrate into your existing risk program, update your org's risk register and make your program durable

In this step, the quantitative risk program is mature and you’re making tweaks, making it better, adding rigor, and bringing people along for the risk journey. Work on converting the risk register (if you have one) and the formal risk program over to quantitative as your final big step.

Through your work, risk management and the risk register is not busywork; something you show auditors once a year. It’s used as an integral part of business forecasting, helping drive strategic decisions. It’s used by everyone, from the Board down to engineers and everyone in-between.

Here are some references to help with that transition:

Durable Quantitative Risk Programs

The last and final tip is how to make your program durable. You want it to last.

  • Colors and adjectives are OK, but getting stakeholders thinking in numbers will make your program last.
  • Reach far and wide to all areas of the business for SME inputs.
  • Embed your program in all areas of business decision-making.

Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts slide beside an END road sign on the coast, with three points: "Culture eats strategy for breakfast" from Peter Drucker, "Tortoise, not hare," and a note that the greatest challenge is that everyone consumes data differently

The greatest challenge I’ve found isn’t data (or lack of), which is the most common objection to cyber risk quantification. The greatest challenge is that everyone consumes data differently. Some people are perfectly comfortable with a 5-number summary, loss exceedance curve, and a histogram. Others will struggle with decision-making with colors or numbers. Bias, comfort with quantitative data, personal risk tolerance, and organizational risk culture all play a role.

I recommend the work of Edward Tufte to help risk analysts break through these barriers and present quantitative data in a way that is easily understood and facilitates decision-making.

***

I’m always interested in feedback. It helps me improve. Please let me know what you thought of this talk and/or blog post in the comments below. What would you like to see more of? Less of?

More on Risk Quantification

2 responses

  1. Anton

    One interesting thing I learned while getting into Quantitative Cyber Risk Analysis is that many people don't consider the marginal benefits of moving from a qualitative to a quantitative approach. More specifically, sometimes the answer a risk analysis would bring is so trivial that using a quant approach would be a colossal waste of time.As an example, I just moved from a consulting to a BISO role and right now I don't have to worry about the question if I should invest in our IAM or Vulnerability Management capabilities, because I need to do both. Doing a quantitative analysis to decide which should come first would be a crazy waste of resources.I think this all supports your advice for the "Infancy" stage - find a complex decision where more analytical rigor adds actual value. Before that it just seems like a useless statistics exercise.One small caveat: I'm blessed with a technically knowledgeable and trusting C-Suite. So I don't have the problem of the cyber security communication gap at the moment 😉

    1. Tony Martin-Vegue

      I agree with you. I think an early part of the risk assessment process has to be the identification of the decision that needs to be made. The example you gave is a no-brainer decision.

Leave a Reply

Heatmaps to Histograms: Field Notes

It’s a free newsletter for risk and security professionals, and each issue brings a practical CRQ technique, a case study from the field, and a tool or prompt you can use the same day.

Your welcome email includes Chapter 5 of the book, Your First Quantitative Risk Assessment, where you build a Monte Carlo simulation in Excel and run a complete risk analysis, free.

Delivered by Substack. No spam, and you can leave with one click.

Discover more from Tony Martin-Vegue

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading